Published : 2026-09-30

YEZIDI NATIONAL ASPIRATIONS AFTER 2014. THE AUTONOMY OF EZIDIḪAN AS A CLAIM TO SELF-DETERMINATION

Section: Articles Varia

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article analyses the Yezidis’ pursuit of self-determination, focusing on institutionalising their political subjectivity through the Autonomy of Ezidiḫan, proclaimed in 2015.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODOLOGY: The research problem is framed as a question: how did the 2014 genocide transform Yezidi ethno-religious identity into a project of ethno-national identity, and to what extent does the proclamation of Ezidiḫan constitute an exercise of internal self-determination? The study employs qualitative content analysis, the institutional-legal method and the historical method. Sources include Ezidiḫan government documents, Arabic-language Iraqi press, Iraqi, Kurdish and UN legal instruments, and Polish, English and Arabic scholarship.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The article first reconstructs a theoretical framework drawing on modernism, Anthony D. Smith’s ethnosymbolism, Rogers Brubaker’s notion of “groupness” and the distinction between internal and external self-determination. It then reviews the state of research, explains religion’s role as a group boundary, and traces four currents of Yezidi identity since the 1930s. Finally, it analyses the 2014 genocide and the dispute over Sinjar through Iraqi and Kurdish legal instruments.

RESEARCH RESULTS: The Autonomy of Ezidiḫan, proclaimed on 4 September 2015, meets the criteria of neither a quasi-state nor a de facto state; it is instead a claim to internal self-determination, expressed in the register of indigenous peoples’ rights. The 2014 genocide acted as a catalyst of “groupness” rather than the source of a national identity whose origins lie in the Yezidis’ incorporation into the modern Iraqi state in the 1930s.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The government’s activities reflect the nation-building aspirations of the Sinjar community, although their legitimacy among the resident population remains empirically unresolved. Adopting the language of indigenous peoples’ rights rather than secessionist rhetoric renders the Yezidi claim acceptable to Baghdad. Field research on support and comparison with other indigenous autonomy projects in the region are recommended.

Keywords

Yezidis ; Sinjar ; Islamic State ; nation ; Ezidiḫan



Details

References

Indicators

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Altmetric indicators


Licence

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:


Redakcja czasopisma
Horyzonty Polityki

email: horyzonty@ignatianum.edu.pl
email: horyzonty.polityki@ignatianum.edu.pl
tel. +48 12 3999 651
O platformie:
Copyright 2019 by Uniwersytet Ignatianum w Krakowie
OJS Support and Customization by LIBCOM
Platform & workfow by OJS/PKP