Medialna debata wokół interpretacji historii w wywiadzie Tuckera Carlsona z Władimirem Putinem

Paweł F.  Nowakowski

doi:10.35765/hp.2929

Published : 2025-12-31

Vol. 16 No. 57 (2025)

Medial debate on the interpretation of history in Tucker Carlson’s interview with Vladimir Putin

Paweł F. Nowakowski

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-9061

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2929

Section: Articles Varia

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The article analyses the historical segment of the Carlson–Putin interview as a narrative device and examines media reactions to the use of the past to justify Russia’s contemporary political actions.

RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The central problem concerns how Vladimir Putin’s historical narrative functions in the media sphere and how the journalist’s lack of critical scrutiny affects its reception in public debate. The study uses qualitative content analysis with a comparative element, examining the interview itself, media reactions in Poland and Western countries, and selected commentaries by historians and analysts. The article lies at the intersection of media communication studies, contemporary history, and political discourse analysis.

PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The argument follows a problem-oriented structure. Putin’s historical narrative is reconstructed chronologically, with attention to its key components and interpretive strategies.

RESEARCH RESULTS: The analysis shows that the historical part of the interview is neither a digression nor an obstruction tactic, but a coherent, teleological narrative designed to legitimise the Russian Federation’s current political actions. It is based on selective events, linear ordering, and meanings aligned with Russian raison d’état. Carlson’s limited intervention and lack of substantive corrections to simplifications and chronological errors positioned him as a narrative intermediary rather than a critical moderator, shaping the interview’s course and reception.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The study finds that Carlson does not differ substantially from his mainstream media critics, who also lack historical expertise. Media debate largely runs parallel to, rather than within, the historical narrative presented by Putin. Given the availability of sources, journalists conducting politically sensitive interviews and commentators engaging in related polemics should be substantively prepared and consult professional historians, as insufficient preparation reinforces one-sided messaging even when it is widely criticised.

Keywords

Carlson-Putin interview ; historical narrative ; political discourse ; media communication ; propaganda

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Paweł F. Nowakowski, Łabędź, K. (Red.) (2024). Socjologia i psychologia polityki. Seria „Słowniki Społeczne”. W. Pasierbek & B. Szlachta (Red.). Kraków: Wydaw-nictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ignatianum w Krakowie [recenzja] , HORIZONS OF POLITICS: Vol. 16 No. 56 (2025): The European Union as a Model of Regional Integration

Details

References

Indicators

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Zasady cytowania

Altmetric indicators

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:

Total abstract views : 115

PDF Downloads : 66