Classification and Assessment of Measures Adopted to Reduce the Adverse Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Agriculture

Michał Wielechowski; Andrzej  Jędruchniewicz

doi:10.35765/hp.2670

Published : 2025-03-30

Vol. 16 No. 54 (2025)

Classification and Assessment of Measures Adopted to Reduce the Adverse Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Agriculture

Michał Wielechowski

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-8971

Andrzej Jędruchniewicz

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3133-6880

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2670

Section: Articles Varia

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The study aims to develop a catalogue of the primary instruments implemented to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in agriculture and assess their advantages and disadvantages.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem is the classification of primary instruments mitigating the effects of the pandemic in agriculture and their assessment. The study was conducted based on the literature review, data from the OECD, and incorporating authors’ knowledge and experience.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: A review of existing literature on the instruments implemented to mitigate the effects of the pandemic in agriculture, presentation of the research methodology, identification and classification of public support instruments, the assessment of their advantages and disadvantages, and presentation of conclusions and recommendations.

RESEARCH RESULTS: We identify eight categories of instruments, i.e., financial support, supply chain and market support, labour support, policy support, technological support, tax relief, research and development support, and food safety measures. Financial aid offers crucial relief but carries risks of dependency and uneven allocation. Supply chain support promises market stability but could encounter operational hurdles. Labour support helps address workforce gaps, though it may result in long-term costs. Policy support ensures a swift response but can create regulatory instability. Technological support boosts efficiency while also raising concerns about accessibility and costs. Tax relief and research and development support bring immediate and future benefits, respectively, yet require careful planning. Food safety measures are vital for continuity but need sustainable strategies.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Our analysis highlights the need for well-coordinated strategies, programs, and instruments to address the diverse challenges in the agricultural sector during pandemics. This paper adds to the discussion on crisis policy responses and their sector-specific applications. It provides insights for policymakers and stakeholders and may support future policy development.

Keywords

COVID-19 ; public support ; support instrument ; agriculture

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Andrzej Jędruchniewicz, State policy towards agriculture in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic , HORIZONS OF POLITICS: Vol. 13 No. 45 (2022): The Authority of Political Power

Details

References

Indicators

Authors

Download files

PDF

Zasady cytowania

Altmetric indicators

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:

References

Aday, S., & Aday, M.S. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the food sup-ply chain. Food Quality and Safety, 4(4), 167–180. DOI: 10.1093/fqsafe/fyaa024

Alam, G.M., Khatun, M.N., Sarker, M.N.I., Joshi, N.P., & Bhandari, H. (2023). Promoting agri-food systems resilience through ICT in developing countries amid COVID-19. Frontiers in Sustainable Fo-od Systems, 6, 972667. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.972667

Altieri, M.A., & Nicholls, C.I. (2020). Agroecology and the emergence of a post COVID-19 agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 37(3), 525–526. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10043-7

Baker, S.R., Bloom, N., Davis, S.J., Kost, K., Sammon, M., & Viratyo-sin, T. (2020). The Unprecedented Stock Market Reaction to CO-VID-19. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, raaa008. DOI: 10.1093/rapstu/raaa008

Baldwin, R.E., & Tomiura, E. (2020). Thinking ahead about the trade impact of COVID-19. In Economics in the Time of COVID-19 (pp. 59–71). Paris–London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Barman, A., Das, R., & De, P.K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 in food supply chain: Disruptions and recovery strategy. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100017. DOI: 10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100017

Bochtis, D., Benos, L., Lampridi, M., Marinoudi, V., Pearson, S., & Sørensen, C.G. (2020). Agricultural Workforce Crisis in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 12(19), 8212. DOI: 10.3390/su12198212

Charlton, D., & Castillo, M. (2021). Potential Impacts of a Pandemic on the US Farm Labor Market. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 39–57. DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13105

Chicas, R., Xiuhtecutli, N., Houser, M., Glastra, S., Elon, L., Sands, J.M., McCauley, L., & Hertzberg, V. (2022). COVID-19 and Agri-cultural Workers: A Descriptive Study. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 24(1), 58–64. DOI: 10.1007/s10903-021-01290-9

Cypress, B.S. (2022). COVID-19: The economic impact of a pandemic on the healthcare delivery system in the United States. Nursing Forum, 57(2), 323–327. DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12677

Czech, K., Wielechowski, M., Kotyza, P., Benešová, I., & Laputková, A. (2020). Shaking Stability: COVID-19 Impact on the Visegrad Group Countries’ Financial Markets. Sustainability, 12(15), 6282. DOI: 10.3390/su12156282

Daniłowska, A., Gruziel, K., Kłoczko-Gajewska, A., & Wielechowski, M. (Eds.). (2024). Ekonomiczno-społeczne skutki pandemii COVID-19 dla rolnictwa w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SGGW.

Darnhofer, I. (2020). Farm resilience in the face of the unexpected: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Agriculture and Human Values, 37(3), 605–606. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10053-5

Dayioğlu, M.A., & Turker, U. (2021). Digital Transformation for Su-stainable Future – Agriculture 4.0: A review. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. DOI: 10.15832/ankutbd.986431

Deconinck, K., Avery, E., & Jackson, L.A. (2020). Food Supply Chains and Covid-19: Impacts and Policy Lessons. EuroChoices, 19(3), 34–39. DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12297

European Court of Auditors. (2023). Securing agricultural product supply chains during COVID-19: EU response was rapid, but insuffi-ciently targeted by member states. Special report 09, 2023. Publica-tions Office. DOI: 10.2865/86166

FAO and OECD. (2021). Survey on G20 Agricultural Resilience and Risk Management Policies under the COVID-19 Pandemic. FAO, OECD. DOI: 10.4060/cb7148en

Giri, A.K., McDonald, T., Subedi, D., & Whitt, C. (2021). U.S. Agricul-ture Sector Received an Estimated $35 Billion in COVID-19-Related Assistance in 2020. DOI: 10.22004/AG.ECON.313516

Goodell, J.W. (2020). COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101512. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101512

Gródek-Szostak, Z., Adamczyk, J., Luc, M., Suder, M., Tora, J., Kotu-lewicz-Wisińska, K., Zysk, W., & Szeląg-Sikora, A. (2022). Hard Cash in Hard Times—The Effect of Institutional Support for Bu-sinesses Shaken by COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(8), 4399. DOI: 10.3390/su14084399

Gruère, G., & Brooks, J. (2021). Viewpoint: Characterising early agricultural and food policy responses to the outbreak of CO-VID-19. Food Policy, 100, 102017. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102017

Guo, J., Jin, S., Zhao, J., Wang, H., & Zhao, F. (2022). Has COVID-19 accelerated the E-commerce of agricultural products? Evidence from sales data of E-stores in China. Food Policy, 112, 102377. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102377

Haggag, W.M. (2021). Agricultural digitalization and rural deve-lopment in COVID-19 response plans: A review article. Interna-tional Journal of Agricultural Technology, 17(1), 67–74.

Jakfar, F., & Halim, H. (2022). Agricultural commodity supply chain during the covid-19 pandemic. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 951(1), 012109. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/951/1/012109

Jędruchniewicz, A., Kozak, S., Maśniak, J., & Mikuła, A. (Eds.). (2024). Kanały i mechanizmy oddziaływania pandemii COVID-19 na rolnictwo w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SGGW.

Jędruchniewicz, A., & Wielechowski, M. (2023). Prices of Means of Production in Agriculture and Agricultural Prices and Income in Poland During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H – Oeconomia, 57(3), 139–156. DOI: 10.17951/h.2023.57.3.139-156

Jiménez, D.E., & Saldarriaga-Isaza, A. (2022). Economic impacts of agricultural policy responses to the outbreak of COVID-19. Estu-dios Gerenciales, 200–210. DOI: 10.18046/j.estger.2022.163.4924

Koh, D. (2020). COVID-19 lockdowns throughout the world. Occupa-tional Medicine, 70(5), 322–322. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa073

Mahmood, H., Furqan, M., Meraj, G., & Shahid Hassan, M. (2024). The effects of COVID-19 on agriculture supply chain, food secu-rity, and environment: A review. PeerJ, 12, e17281. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17281

Meixner, O., Quehl, H.E., Pöchtrager, S., & Haas, R. (2022). Being a Farmer in Austria during COVID-19—A Qualitative Study on Challenges and Opportunities. Agronomy, 12(5), 1240. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12051240

OECD (2021a). Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2021: Addressing the Challenges Facing Food Systems. OECD. DOI: 10.1787/2d810e01-en

OECD (2021b). Keep calm and carry on feeding: Agriculture and food policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis (OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19)) [OECD Policy Responses to Coronavi-rus (COVID-19)]. DOI: 10.1787/db1bf302-en

Quandt, A., Keeney, A.J., Flores, L., Flores, D., & Villaseñor, M. (2022). “We left the crop there lying in the field”: Agricultural worker experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic in a rural US-Mexico border region. Journal of Rural Studies, 95, 533–543. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.039

Rifin, A., Harianto, Feryanto, & Herawati. (2023). Strengthening Supply Chain for Post COVID-19 Food Security: An Exploratory Research Review. Sustainability Science and Resources, 3, 85–107. DOI: 10.55168/ssr2809-6029.2022.3005

Siche, R. (2020). What is the impact of COVID-19 disease on agricul-ture? Scientia Agropecuaria, 11(1), Article 1. DOI: 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.01.00

Sieradzka, K., & Luft, R. (2023). Public support for enterprise opera-tion in Poland in conditions of crisis caused by SARS-COV-2 pandemic. In J. Duda & T. Bernat, Business Impacts of COVID-19 (1st ed., pp. 109–123). New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003368687-8

Trivedi, S., Negi, S., & Anand, N. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on agriculture supply chain in India and the proposed solutions. In-ternational Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and In-formatics, 6(4), 359. DOI: 10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.112864

WHO and FAO (2020). COVID-19 and Food Safety: Guidance for com-petent authorities responsible for national food safety control systems. WHO and FAO. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca8842en

Woc-Colburn, L. (2023). COVID-19: The changing landscape. In CO-VID-19 Viral Sepsis (pp. 251–261). Cambridge: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91812-1.00008-1

Zhemkova, A. (2023). The Impact of Government Support on Firms’ Productivity during COVID-19. Higher School of Economics Econo-mic Journal, 27(4), 481–505. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2023-27-4-481-505

Total abstract views : 256

PDF Downloads : 118