Rozwój e-administracji w polskich miastach w następstwie kryzysu  związanego z pandemią COVID-19

Jakub Kwaśny

doi:10.35765/hp.2180

Published : 2021-11-05

Vol. 13 No. 42 (2022)

E-GOVERNMENT IN POLISH CITIES AS A RESULT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC CRISIS

Jakub Kwaśny

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0786-304X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2180

Section: Thematic Articles

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to identify the challenges faced by Polish local governments in implementing e-administration and to analyze the necessary changes – resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic – in the field of regulations for the effective implementation of public policies at the local government level.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The main problem is to determine how to effectively respond to changes in the functioning of local government units in terms of satisfying citizens’ needs. The research methodology is based on two techniques: a review of the literature on the subject and the analysis of the results of surveys conducted among local government officials.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: consists of two essential elements. The first characterizes the essence and purpose of the development of e-administration and specifies the legal conditions. The second part focuses on the results of own research on the pandemic effects for the development of e-administration in local governments.

RESEARCH RESULTS: The analysis shows that despite the growing digital competences this area is not a priority within the framework of public policies. As the study shows, most of the surveyed officials declare to not have a strategy for implementing public e-services, and the changes are incidental. The most important barriers include complex regulations and high costs of their implementation as well as their usefulness for citizens.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Further implementation of e-administration requires both: the simplification of the regulations and a strategic plan ensuring the integration of various systems and their interoperability. This creates the need to develop and implement long-term strategy plans in order to improve e-services provided by local governments.

Keywords

local government ; e-administration ; public policy ; pandemic

Details

References

Indicators

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Zasady cytowania

Altmetric indicators

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:

References

Banasikowska J., Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz A., (2013), Zasady interoperacyjności i standaryzacji w systemach wszechobecnych e-Government krajów Unii Europejskiej, Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych nr 29/2013.

Bertot J. C., Jaeger P. T., Grimes J. M., (2010), Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001.

Bigdeli A.Z., Kamal M.M., Cesare S., (2013), Electronic information sharing in local government authorities:Factors influencing the decision-making process, International Journal of Information Management 33, s. 816– 830.

Bonsón E., Torres L., Royo S., Flores F., (2012), Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities, Government Information Quarterly 29, s. 123–132.

Carter L., Bélanger F., (2005)., The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors, Information Systems Journal, 15(1), s. 5–25. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x.

Chourabi H., Nam T., Walker S., Gil-Garcia J. R., Mellouli S., Nahon K., Scholl H. J., (2012), Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, s. 2289-2297. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.615

Chun S. A., Shulman S., Sandoval R., Hovy, E., (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity 15, s. 1–9.

Clark G., Couturier J., Kelly J., Moonen T., (2015), Globalisation and Competition: The New World of Cities. Cities Research Center.

Dias G.P., (2019), Are smart cities reshaping local e-government research?, 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Coimbra, Portugal, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760778.

Dias G.P., (2019), Fifteen years of e-government research in Ibero-America: a bibliometric analysis, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 400-411, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.008.

Dias G.P., (2020), Determinants of e-government implementation at the local level: an empirical model, Online Information Review, Vol. 44 No. 7, pp. 1307-1326. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2020-0148.

Dixon B. E., (2010), Towards e-government 2.0: An assessment of where e-Government 2.0 is and where it is headed. Public Administration & Management, 15(2), s. 418–454.

Gore, A., 1993, Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less: Reengineering Through Information Technology. Report of the National Performance Review. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.

Grodzka D., (2007), E-administracja w Polsce, Infos Biuro Analiz Sejmowych nr 18.

Haręża A., (2011), Wprowadzenie do problematyki elektronicznej administracji publicznej, „Prawo mediów elektronicznych. Kwartalnik Nnaukowy” 2011, nr 1.

Jedlińska R., Rogowska B., (2016), Rozwój e-administracji w Polsce, Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, Muzeum Historii Polski nr 123.

Kowalczyk M., (2009), E-urząd w komunikacji z obywatelem, Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa.

Kos-Łabędowicz J., Talar S., (2013), Rola Internetu w procesie konwergencji rozwojowej współczesnej gospodarki światowej, Studia Ekonomiczne Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach nr 170.

Kourtit K., Nijkamp P., (2012), Smart cities in the innovation age, Innovation, The European, Journal of Social Sciences, 25, 2, s. 93–95.

Kozłowska D., (2010), Aktywna biblioteka: Miejsce dla obywateli: e-administracja, Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Informacyjnego, Warszawa.

Kwaśny J., (2013), Uwarunkowania rozwoju e-administracji w polskich samorządach, [w:] Kultura i administracja w przestrzeni społecznej internetu (red.) Rykiel Z., Kinal J., Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, s. 101-116.

Lazer D., Nebolo M., Esterling K., Goldschmidt K., (2009), Online town hall meetings, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Management Foundation.

Lytras M. D., Serban A. C., (2020), E-Government Insights to Smart Cities Research: European Union (EU) Study and the Role of Regulations. IEEE Access, 8, 65313–65326, doi:10.1109/access.2020.2982737.

Masik G., Studzińska D., (2018), Ewolucja koncepcji i badania miasta inteligentnego, Przegląd Geograficzny, 90(4), a. 557-571. doi:10.7163/PrzG.2018.4.2.

Moon M. J., (2002), The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00196.

Muksin A., Avianto B. N., (2021), Governance innovation: One-stop integrated service to enhance quality service and public satisfaction. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 16(1), s. 40-60.

Nowina-Konopka M., Europejska koncepcja e-government w świetle wskaźników Komisji Europejskiej, Zeszyty Prasoznawcze, Kraków 2017, T. 60, nr 2 (230), s. 329–349 DOI:10.4467/22996362PZ.17.021.7301

Noveck B., (2009), Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press.

Novotny D., Sabati Z., (2007), Internet enabled public services as a driver of economic growth-case study eCroatia 2006. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 31(1), s. 141-156.

Osimo D., (2008), Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How?, European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.

Pereira G.V., Parycek P., Falco E., Kleinhans R., (2018), Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review, Inf. Polity, vol. 23, no. 2, s. 143-162.

Pina V., Torres L., Royo S., (2007), Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study, Public Administration, Vol. 85 No. 2, s. 449-472, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00654.x.

Rada Ministrów, (2007), Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 28 marca 2007 r. w sprawie „Planu Informatyzacji Państwa na lata 2007-2010” (Akt utracił moc) www.isap.sejm.gov.pl (dostęp: 10.05.2021).

Reddick C.G., (2005), Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?, Government Information Quaterly 22, s. 38–57.

Sejm RP, (2000), Uchwała Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 14 lipca 2000 r. w sprawie budowania podstaw społeczeństwa informacyjnego w Polsce, M.P.2000.22.448. www.isap.sejm.gov.pl (dostęp: 20.04.2021).

Snellen I., (1998), Street-level Bureaucracy in an Information Age, [w:]: Snellen I., Donk W., (red.), Public administration in an information age: A handbook, Amsterdam, IOS Press, s. 497–505.

Snellen I., (2002), Electronic governance: Implications for citizens, politicians, and public servants, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(2), 183–198.

Trajkovik V., (2010), ICT for Local Governments. Standards, Principles and Best Practices, NALAS, Skopje.

UE, (2014), Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 910/2014 w sprawie identyfikacji elektronicznej i usług zaufania publicznego w odniesieniu do transakcji elektronicznych na rynku wewnętrznym, www.eurlex.europa.eu (dostęp: 12.03.2021).

Ustawa, (2001), Ustawa z dnia 18 września 2001 r. o podpisie elektronicznym (uchylona 7 października 2016 r.) www.isap.sejm.gov.pl (dostęp: 12.05.2021).

Ustawa, (2002), Ustawa z dnia 18 lipca 2002 r. o świadczeniu usług drogą elektroniczną (Dz. U. 2020.344 t.j.), www.isap.sejm.gov.pl (dostęp: 12.05.2021).

Ustawa, (2005), Ustawa z dnia 17 lutego 2005 r. o informatyzacji działalności podmiotów realizujących zadania publiczne. Tekst jednolity: Dz.U. 2021 poz. 670. www.isap.sejm.gov.pl (dostęp: 10.05.2021).

Ustawa, (2016), Ustawa z dnia 5 września 2016 r. o usługach zaufania oraz identyfikacji elektronicznej (Dz.U.2020.1173 z późn. zm), www.isap.sejm.gov.pl (dostęp: 10.05.2021).

Wilk S., (2014), E-administracja w społeczeństwie informacyjnym. Model a rzeczywistość na przykładzie województwa podkarpackiego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, Rzeszów.

Zanella A., Bui N., Castellani A., Vangelista L., Zorzi M., (2014), Internet of things for smart cities, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), s. 22-32. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328.

Total abstract views : 537

PDF Downloads : 544