The  Shepherd-King Metaphor in the Light of Interdisciplinary Research

Piotr Świercz

doi:10.35765/hp.2646

Published : 2024-06-30

Vol. 15 No. 51 (2024)

The Shepherd-King Metaphor in the Light of Interdisciplinary Research

Piotr Świercz

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6290-879X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2646

Section: Articles Varia

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to analyze the sources of the shepherd-king metaphor, mainly from the perspective of social-political ideas, within a broad cultural and intellectual context.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The article focuses on identifying the intellectual sources of the shepherd-king metaphor in antiquity, their anthropological and cosmological context, and the metaphor’s fundamental message. Particular emphasis is placed on the socio-political aspect; thus, analyses of strictly theological significance are left aside. To achieve the research objective, the author makes use of interdisciplinary instruments, referring to archaeological, biological, and historical knowledge and especially to analyses from the field of the history of ideas.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The article’s line of argument reflects the fundamental problems that need to be solved in order to determine the essence and shape of the shepherd-king metaphor. Therefore, the issues analyzed include animal domestication; ancient anthropology understood as the divine domestication of humans; and the distinctions drawn in ancient thought between the essence of the nature of animals, humans, rulers, and gods.

RESEARCH RESULTS: As a result of the analyses indicated above, it was possible to capture the main components of the shepherd-king metaphor, their structure and essence, as well as their direct reference to, and significance for both anthropology and socio-political thought.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The article highlights the importance of the shepherd-king metaphor to the history of political ideas, outlining the impact of both its explicit theses and its more implicit, but no less important, elements. Attention was also drawn to the need for further research, which would enable the metaphor’s socio-political aspects analyzed in this article to be combined into one coherent interpretation with the religious and theological aspects.

Keywords

Shepherd-King Metaphor ; Domestication ; Gilgamesh ; Political Philosophy ; Political Legitimization

Details

References

Indicators

Authors

Download files

pdf

Zasady cytowania

Altmetric indicators

Licence

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:

References

Adams, R.M. (1981). The Heartland of Cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Arbuckle, B.S., & Hammer E.L. (2018). The Rise of Pastoralism in the Ancient Near East. Journal of Archaeological Research, 27, 391–449.

Arendt, M., Cairns, K.M., Ballard, J.W.O., Savolainen, P., & Axels-son, E. (2016). Diet adaptation in dog reflects spread of prehistor-ic agriculture. Heredity, 117, 301–306.

Aristotle (1981). The Politics. J.S. Trevor, & T.A. Sinclair (Eds.). New York: Penguin Books.

Botigué, L.R., Shiya, S., Scheu, A., Gopalan, S., Pendleton, A.L., Oet-jens, M., Taravella, A.M., Seregély, T., Zeeb-Lanz, A., Arbogast, R.-M., Bobo, D., Daly, K., Unterländer, M., Burger, J., Kidd, J.M., & Veeramah K.R. (2017). Ancient European dog genomes reveal continuity since the Early Neolithic. Nature Communications, 8, 16082.

d’Anna, M.B. & Palumbi, G. (2017). Uruk, Pastoralism and Secondary Products: Was it a Revolution? A View from the Anatolian High-lands. In Appropriating Innovations: Entangled Knowledge in Eura-sia, 5000–1500 BCE, P.W. Stockhammer, & J. Maran (Eds.), 29–39. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

Dunbar, R. (1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6), 469–493.

Dunbar, R. (2005). The Human Story. A New History of Mankind’s Evolution. London: Faber and Faber.

Dunbar, R. (2014). Human Evolution. London: Penguin Books.

Emberling, G., & Minc L. (2016). Ceramics and long-distance trade in early Mesopotamian states. Journal of Archaeological Science: Re-ports, 819–834.

George, A.R. (2003). The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic. Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts. New York: Oxford University Press.

George, A.R. (2018). Enkidu and the Harlot: Another Fragment of Old Babylonian Gilgameš. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, 108, 20.

Goodenough, E.R. (1929). Kingship in Early Israel. Journal of Biblical Literature, 48 (3-4), 169–205.

Hobbes, T. (1651/1985). Leviathan. C.B. Macpherson (Ed.). New York: Penguin Books.

Holslag, J. (2019). A Political History of the World. Three Thousand Years of War and Peace. London: Pelican Books.

Lees, S.H. & Bates D.G. (1974). The Origins of Specialized Nomadic Pastoralism: A Systemic Model. American Antiquity, 39(2), 187–193.

Marlowe, F. (2010). The Hadza: Hunter-Gatherers of Tanzania. Berke-ley: University of California Press.

Porter, A. (2012). Mobile Pastoralism and the Formation of Near Eastern Civilizations: Weaving Together Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Prassack, K.A., DuBois, J., Lázničková-Galetová M., Germonpré M., & Ungar P.S. (2020). Dental microwear as a behavioral proxy for distinguishing between canids at the Upper Paleolithic (Gravett-ian) site of Předmostí, Czech Republic. Journal of Archaeological Science, 115, 105092.

Rosen, S.A. (2016). Revolutions in the Desert: The Rise of Mobile Pasto-ralism in the Southern Levant. London: Taylor and Francis.

Scurlock, J. (2014). Images of Tammuz: The Intersection of Death, Divinity, and Royal Authority in ancient Mesopotamia. In J.A. Hill, P. Jones, & A.J. Morales (Eds.), Experiencing Power – Gen-erating Authority: Cosmos, Politics, and the Ideology of Kingship in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia (pp. 151–182). Philadelphia: Uni-versity of Pennsylvania Press.

Sumner, W. (1989). Anshan in the Kaftari Phase: Patterns of Settle-ment and Land Use. In L. de Meyer, & E. Haerinck (Eds.), Archae-ologia Iranica et Orientalis: Miscellanea in Honorem Louis Vanden Berghe (pp. 135–161). Gent: Peeters Press.

Sundsdal, K. (2011). The Uruk Expansion: Culture Contact, Ideology and Middlemen. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 44(2), 164–185.

Tattersall, I. (2008). The World from Beginnings to 4000 BCE. New York: Oxford University Press.

Vila, E. (1998). L’exploitation des animaux en Mésopotamie aux IVe et IIIe millénaires avant J.-C. Paris: CNRS Editions.

Zeder, M.A. (2012). Pathways to animal domestication. In P. Gepts, T.R. Famula, R.L. Bettinger, S.B. Brush, A.B. Damania, P.E. McGuire, & C.O. Qualset (Eds.), Biodiversity in Agriculture: Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability (pp. 227–259). Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Total abstract views : 68

PDF Downloads : 54