Understanding disorder in the law and jurisprudence (the perspective  of legal positivism)

Michał Peno

doi:10.35765/hp.2397

Published : 2022-12-07

Vol. 14 No. 47 (2023)

Understanding disorder in the law and jurisprudence (the perspective of legal positivism)

Michał Peno

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-3783

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2397

Section: Vol. 14, No. 47 (2023): The limits of power in a constitutional democracy

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The main task involves an attempt to characterize a disordered law and concerns characterizing the most important aspects of the disorder.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEMS AND METHODS: The main task of the article are terminological and conceptual arrangements. Therefore, the method of linguistic analysis was used, adapting conceptions knew in theory and philosophy of law to the needs of the analysis of the concept of the disorder.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: Starting from the analysis of the main, known theories of law, concepts and ideas, various cases of disorder of the legal system are identified, both in the political, ethical and purely formal aspects.

RESEARCH RESULTS: The analysis allowed to identify and reconstruct certain specific types of disorder. Law, on many levels – from formal to merits of law – can be a source of moral and ideological chaos. Law may serve intentional destabilization of social life.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Traditionally law is associated with order and consistency rather than disorder and chaos. Nevertheless, the disorder and chaos can be seen as a real and factual part of the law.

Keywords

philosophy of law ; disorder ; justice ; totalitarian law ; narrativity of law

Details

References

Indicators

Authors

Download files

PDF

Zasady cytowania

Altmetric indicators

Licence

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:

References

Adamska-Gallant, A. (2022). Backsliding of the Rule of Law in Po-land – a Systemic Problem With the Independence of Courts. In-ternational Journal for Court Administration, 13(3), 2–8. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.474.

Aghion, Ph., & Tirole, J. (1997). Formal and Real Authority in Or-ganizations. Journal of Political Economy, 10(1), 1–29.

Alexy, R. (1989). A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.

Bauman, Z. (1997). Postmodernity and Its Discontents. New York: New York University Press.

Bingham, T.H. (2010). The Rule of Law. London: Allen Lane.

Carey, Ch. (1996). Nomos in Athenian Rhetoric and Oratory. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 116, 33–46. DOI: 10.2307/631954.

Castañeda, H.N. (1965). The Logic of Change, Action, and Norms. The Journal of Philosophy, 62(13), 333–344. DOI: 10.2307/2023370.

Cesari, J. (2002). Islam in France: The Shaping of a Religious Minority. In Y.Y. Haddad (Ed.), Muslims in the West: From So-journers to Citizens. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195148053.003.0003 (accessed on: 6th Dec. 2022).

Craig, P. (1997). Formal and Substantive Conceptions of teh Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework. Public Law. Autumn (3), 467–487. DOI: 10.4324/9781315085302-4.

d’Entreves, A.P. (1972). Natural Law. Hutchinson University Library.

Dworkin, R. (1982). Law as Interpretation. Critical Inquiry, 9(1), 179–200.

Foucault, M. (1990). The Use of Pleasure. New York: Vintage Books.

Gómez, D.P. (2022). Crisis of the Rule of Law in Europe: The Cases of Hungary, Poland and Spain. Athens Journal of Law, 7(3), 379–398. DOI: 10.30958/ajl.7-3-6.

Grogan, J. (2022). COVID-19, The Rule of Law and Democracy. Analysis of Legal Responses to a Global Health Crisis. Hague Journal of Rule Law, 14, 349–369. DOI: 10.1007/s40803-022-00168-8.

Gray, J. (2002). Two Faces of Liberalism. New York: The New Press.

Hiroven, A. (2010). Total Evil: The Law Under Totalitarianism. In A. Hirvonen and J. Porttikivi (Ed.), Law and Evil. Philosophy, Politics, Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 117–147. DOI: 10.4324/9780203867464.

Kelsen, H. (1966). On the Pure Theory of Law. Israel Law Review, 1(1), 1–7. DOI: 10.1017/S0021223700013595.

Kimball, R. (2012). Fortunes of Permanence, The Culture and Anarchy in an Age of Amnesia. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.

Krygier, M., & Czarnota, A. (2016). The Rule of Law after Communism: Problems and Prospects in East-Central Europe. London: Routledge.

Krygier, M. (1986). Law as Tradition. Law and Philosophy, 5(2), 237–262. DOI: 10.1007/BF00190762.

Lapenna, A.I. (1968). Soviet Penal Policy. London: The Bodley Head.

Marciano, A. (2011). Constitutional Mythologies. New Perspectives on Controlling the State. New York: Springer.

Marmor, A. (2021). The Pure Theory of Law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-theory/ (accessed on: 7th Dec. 2022).

Peczenik, A. (1985). On the Rational and Moral Basis of Legal Justi-fication. ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 71(2), 263–267.

Peczenik, A. (1989). On Law and Reason. Dordrecht–Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Pinheiro, P.S. (2000). Democratic Governance, Violence, and the (Un)Rule of Law. Daedalus, 129(2), 119–143.

Ross, A. (1968). Directives and Norms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

Şerban, M. (2019). Subverting Communism in Romania: Law and Private Property 1945–1965. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Shaw, G.C. (2014). The Rise and Fall of Liberal Legal Positivism. Legal Positivism, Legal Process, and H. L. A. Hart’s America 1945-1960. Oxford: University of Oxford.

Southwood, N. (2010). Contractualism and the Foundations of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzso36.

Steinweis, A.E., & Rachlin, R.D. (Eds.). (2013). The Law in Nazi Ger-many: Ideology, Opportunism, and the Perversion of Justice (1st ed.). New York: Berghahn Books. DOI: 10.3167/9780857457806.

Summers, R.S. (1995). The Juristic Study of Law’s Formal Character. Ratio Juris, 8(3), 237–247. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.1995.tb00211.x.

van der Burg, W. (1990). Jürgen Habermas on Law and Morality: Some Critical Comments. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(4), 105–111. DOI: 10.1177/026327690007004007.

von Wright, G.H. (1963). Norm and Action. A Logical Enquiry. Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI: 10.2307/2218217.

Weinreb, L.L. (1987). Natural Law and Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wolfe, C. (1994). Liberalism and Paternalism: A Critique of Ronald Dworkin. The Review of Politics, 56(4), 615–639. DOI: 10.1017/S0034670500019100.

Zieliński, M. (2012). Wykładnia prawa. Zasady, reguły, wskazówki. Warszawa: Lexis Nexis.

Total abstract views : 99

PDF Downloads : 95