Poglądy antyfederalistów na kształt Unii w czasie Konwencji Filadelfijskiej i procesu ratyfikacji Konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych

Tomasz Tulejski

doi:10.35765/hp.2386

Published : 2024-03-30

Vol. 15 No. 50 (2024)

Anti-Federalist views on the shape of the Union during the Philadelphia Convention and the ratification process of the U.S. Constitution

Tomasz Tulejski

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-1173

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2386

Section: Articles Varia

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The article aims to present the main antifederalistic arguments against the U.S. Constitution.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Anti-Federalism was the late 18th-century political movement that opposed the formation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The following questions are posed in this article: Why the Anti-Federalists was opposed to U.S. Constitution? Why the new government was too strong? Why a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and liberty of the states, localities, or individuals?

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The critical analysis of the texts of the U.S. Constitution, Federalists and Anti-Federalists’ papers and the most important arguments in the great constitutional debate has been made.

RESEARCH RESULTS: The Anti-Federalists criticism of the U.S. Constitution resulted from the fears of a consolidated federal government. Its main arguments became, after the ratification, a tool for defending states’ rights as well as the principles of federalism defined during the debates in Philadelphia and at the state conventions.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The study makes it possible to formulate the conclusion, that the Federalists created U.S.Constitution, but the Anti-Federalists coopted it from the very beginning. That tension between Federalists and Anti-federalists has continued throughout United States’ history to the present day.

Keywords

U.S.Constitution ; Anti-Federalism

Details

References

Indicators

Authors

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Zasady cytowania

Altmetric indicators

Licence

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:

References

Caress, Z.E. (2009). Don’t Tread on U.S.: The Impact of Federalism in the Formation of American Government. The Hanover Historical Review, Spring, 10, 9–24.

Coleman, A.N., & Leskiw, Ch.S. (Eds.). (2018). Debating Federalism: From the Founding to Today. Lanham–Boulder–New York–London: Lexington Books.

Cornell, S. (1990a). The Other Founders: Anti-Federalism and the Dis-senting Tradition in American, 1788–1828. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Cornell, S. (1990b). Aristocracy Assailed: The Ideology of Backcoun-try Anti-Federalism. The Journal of American History, 76(4), 1148–1172.

Duncan, Ch.M. (1994). Men of a Different Faith: The Anti-Federalist Ideal in Early American Political Thought. PolityVol., 26(3), 387–415.

Eliot, J. (Ed.). (1845a). The Debates in the Several State Conventions: On the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia, in 1787. Vol. II. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.

Eliot, J. (Ed.). (1845b). The Debates in the Several State Conventions: On the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia, in 1787. Vol. III. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.

Eliot, J. (Ed.). (1845c). The Debates in the Several State Conventions: On the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia, in 1787. Vol. IV. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.

Eliot, J. (Ed.). (1845d). The Debates in the Several State Conventions: On the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia, in 1787. Vol. V. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.

Faber, M.J. (2015). The Federal Union Paradigm of 1788: Three An-ti-Federalists Who Changed Their Minds. American Political Thought, 4(4), 527–556.

Finkelman, P. (1984). The Complete Anti-Federalist. H.J. Storing (Ed.). Cornell Law Review, 70(1), 182–207.

Ford, P.L. (Ed.). (1892). Essays on the Constitution of the United States: Published During Its Discussion by the People, 1787–1788. New York: Historical Printing Club.

Girard, J.P., Mace, D., & Smith, C.M. (Ed.). (2016). American History through its Greatest Speeches: A Documentary History of the United States. Vol. I. Santa Barbara, Denver: ABC-CLIO.

Hemberger, S. (1990). Dead Stepfathers. Northwestern University Law Review, 84(1), 220–231.

Johnson, J.A. (2004). Disposed to Seek Their True Interests: Repre-sentation and Responsibility in AntiFederalist Though. The Review of Politics, 66(4), 649–674.

Kenyon, C.M. (1995). Men of Little Faith: The Anti-Federalists on the Nature of Representative Government. The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series, 12(1), 3–43.

Ketcham, R. (Ed.). (2002). The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitu-tional Convention Debates. New York: Penguin.

Lim, E. (2014). Political Thought, Political Development, and Ameri-ca’s Two Foundings. American Political Thought, Spring, 3(1), 146–156.

Maier, P. (2011). Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York–London–Toronto–Sydney: Simon and Schuster.

McDowell, G.L. (1982). Were the Anti-Federalists Right? Judicial Activism and the Problem of Consolidated Government. Publius, 12(3), 99–108.

Nedelsky, J. (1982). Review: Confining Democratic Politics: An-ti-Federalists, Federalists, and the Constitution. Harvard Law Re-view, 96(1), 340–360.

Richards, L.L. (2014). Shays’s Rebellion: The American Revolution’s Final Battle. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Storing, H.J. (Ed.). (1992). The Anti-Federalist. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.

Wells, W.V. (1865). The Life and Public Services of Samuel Adams. Vol. III. Boston: Little, Brown.

Total abstract views : 118

PDF Downloads : 70