Tyrant and His Power According to John of Salisbury

Jacek Surzyn

doi:10.35765/HP.2019.1033.03

Published : 2020-04-28

Vol. 10 No. 33 (2019)

Tyrant and His Power According to John of Salisbury

Jacek Surzyn

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7959-243X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/HP.2019.1033.03

Section: Thematic Articles

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to attempt to define tyranny in the concept of the medieval philosopher John of Salisbury.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Salisbury is one of the most interesting political thinkers of the Middle Ages. His book entitled “Policraticus” became one of the most important political texts of the Middle Ages, which analyzes, among others, the problem of political authority, the separation of secular and spiritual powers, the problem of the relationship of the ruler with his subjects, as well as the issue of civil obedience and the transformation of legal power into unlawful power. The author tries to show the mechanisms leading to tyrannical power.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The text analyzes all aspects of the tyrannical political power, comparing it to that of a legitimate prince. The tyrant is shown against the background of theological and political assumptions, also in the context of social justice and citizens' rights.

RESEARCH RESULTS: The tyrannical authority is, by its very nature, wrong and does not lead to social harmony and peace. The tyrant is an usurper and his power is immoral and unlawful. As an unjust ruler, the tyrant stands against the divine order and must take into account the inevitability of punishment. At the same time, this punishment for a tyrant falls within the moral and theological contexts, that is, it is a punishment which God sets.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: Salisbury' thought seems to be valid because it is a part of the eternal problem of the dependence of political authority on morality, as well as the tendency to abuse political power over subjects.

Keywords

tyrnat ; John of Salisbury ; Policraticus ; political power ; law

Details

References

Indicators

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Zasady cytowania

Altmetric indicators

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:

References

Arruzza, C. (2019). A Wolf in the City: Tyranny and the Tyrant in Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blackburn, S. (2006). Plato’s „Republic”: A Biography. New York: Atlantic Press.

Brucker, Ch. & Foulechat, D. (1987). Tyrans, princes et prêtres.(Jean de Salisbury, Policratique IV et VIII). Montrèal: Edition Ceres.

Cahn, S.M. (2002). Classics of Political and Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frank, J. (2005). A Democracy of Distinction: Aristotle and the Work of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johannes Saresberiensis (1855). Polycraticus, sive de nugis curialium et vestigiis philosophorum. In: Johannes Saresberiensis, Opera Omnia.

Tomus Unicus. Patrologia Latina, ed. J.‑P. Migne, tomus 199, Paris.

John of Salisbury (1990). Policraticus. Of the Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers, ed. and trans. by C.J. Nederman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jordović, I. (2011). Aristotle on extreme tyranny and extreme democracy. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, Bd. 60, H. 1, 36‑64.

Kerner, M. (1977). Johannes von Salisbury und die Logische Struktur seines Policraticu. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Keyt, D. (2017). Aristotle’s Political Philosophy. In: D. Keyt, Nature and Justice: Studiesin the Ethical and Political Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. Leuven: Peeters, 165‑195.

Laarhoven van, J. (1984), “Thou shalt Not slay a tyrant!”. The So‑Called Theory of John of Salisbury. In: The World of John of Salisbury, ed. by M. Wilks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 319‑341.

Lorenz, H. (2006). The Brute Within: Appetitive Desirein Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon.

Meier, Ch. (1990). The Greek Dyscovery of Politics, trans. by D. McLintock. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Nederman, C.J. (2005). John of Salisbury. Tempe, Arizona.

Nederman, C.J. (2015). John of Salisbury’s Political Theory. In: Ch. Grellard & F. Lachaud, A Companion to John of Salisbury. Leiden–Boston: Brill, pp. 258‑288.

O’Daly, I. (2018). John of Salisbury and the Medieval Roman Renaissence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Platon (1997). Politeia, ed. by O. Höffe. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Sasster, Y. (2015). John of Salisbury and Law. In: A Companion to John of Salisbury, ed. by Ch. Grellard, F. Lachaud. Leiden–Boston: Brill, 235‑257.

Strauss, L. (2000). On Tyranny. Revised and expanded edition including the Strauss‑Kojeve correspondence, ed. by V. Gourevitch, M.S. Roth, Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.

Total abstract views : 173

PDF Downloads : 311